Did you take some profits today?

July 9, 2009 - Leave a Response

Just last month I mentioned here that I was doing my homework on Amgen.

I hope you did, too — because it had a nice 14% pop today.

If you jumped in — I hope you remembered this is a trader’s market — and you took some profits.

After all, you didn’t really make a profit, unless you turned it into cash.

Just remember the usual disclaimer: Don’t base any of your investment decisions on anything you read here. Do your own due diligence, or at least enough research to pick the right professional to do it for you.

I read the news today… oh boy…

July 5, 2009 - Leave a Response

“I read the news today… oh boy….”

That line from a Beatles classic just about sums-up how I feel after reading story-after-story about the 15,000 or so claims being filed by those who were duped by Madoff’s ponzi scheme, wanting to be reimbursed up to a half million from the Securities Investor Protection Corp.

I know-I know, a lot of so-called “innocent” people got duped — and not all were millionaires — but I’ve got to say it….

Are you friggin’ kidding me?

It just goes against my core belief that everyone needs to take personal responsibility for their own investments.

It’s not okay for people to say “Oh boy, aren’t we special? Bernie’s agreed to accept our money, so now we just need to do absolutely nothing but sit back and he’ll grow-grow-grow our money.”

Shame on each and every Madoff investor for not taking personal responsibility and asking many questions about their investments.

Shame on them for not realizing that the statements they received were unrealistic.

I’m not unsympathetic to the many who were not millionaires and the generally very old who believe that everyone with a fancy address on Wall Street who wears nice suits and has a warm twinkle in their eyes is looking out for them.

I do feel bad for them — and perhaps something should be done for them.

However, no one from my generation should receive a single cent of reimbursement — no matter how much they lost.

Let it be a lesson to them.

They still have decades to go before they need to worry about retirement — and needing money for when their kids get old enough for college isn’t a good excuse.

When are these “bailouts” going to end?

Should we reimburse everyone who saw their 401k get socked by the recent volatile market?

After all, many of those people had even less control over what investments they could be in, than the Madoff investors.

I actually feel worse for those people who didn’t have some sort of reserve fund safe haven alternative to rideout their 401k in the volatile market, than I do any of Bernie’s investors who chose to give to him of their free will.

Or how about the person who does their due diligence, buys with an equity position with an informed mind, and then the short-sellers sock the heck out of it?

I mean, if we’re talking “fair” — that doesn’t seem fair to me.

But, the truth is — it really is all fair game.

Investing comes with a risk.

If you’re adverse to risk, then sock your money into an FDIC insured bank’s CD — and just make sure you don’t exceed their insurance limit.

It’s about time everyone carefully read the title of this blog over and over until it actually sinks in — because this ain’t your daddy’s market anymore, baby!

Ok, now I’m off to help some little old ladies crossing the street with a bag of groceries to try to rebuild some good karma points that I surely just lost — as well as to do my DD on AMGN, along with my usual names

Just remember the usual disclaimer: Don’t base any of your investment decisions on anything you read here. Do your own due diligence, or at least enough research to pick the right professional to do it for you.

The answer to your No. 1 question

June 30, 2009 - Leave a Response

Good early pre-opening bell morning to everyone.

Today not only marks the ending of our 30-day “game” for newbies pretending to invest without actually investing a real dollar experiment, but it’s also the end of the quarter, which finds the Dow, S&P, Nasdaq and Russell all up.

No surprise there.

After preaching for the better part of the last year that those who were not doing due diligence on a daily basis should take their money out and keep it safe on the sidelines — or at least a good chunk of it — I’ve equally been preaching for the past few months that it was time to start dipping their toes back in.

That doesn’t mean we’re on a path straight-up. Cost leveraging & routine due diligence are pre-requisites to this unstable market.

For those who realize you just don’t have passion or willingness to invest on your own — I sincerely hope you heed the wisdom in my usual disclaimer and do enough research to find the right professional to handle it for you — whether its a personal financial guru, a great mutual fund manager, or you decide to buy an index fund that you’ve taken the time to study.

But do something.

For those who are on the quest to invest on their own, I share with you some words of wisdom that have been passed down through the ages. A great investor isn’t someone who gets it right 100 percent of the time and only picks winners — it’s someone who invests wisely and can pick themselves up after they’ve taken a beaten.

I rarely do this, but it seems the question I’m being asked the most often is if I had to pick just one stock to invest in right now, what would it be — I’d have to say AT&T. Not only because I think it’s a great company that’s not likely to go out of business in the near future, but because I like its strong dividend return.

But, again, no matter how much I might have my constant names that include AT&T, Walmart, Pepsi, McDonald’s, etc. on my due diligence list — I’m a firm believer in constantly taking any profits when they present themselves and then cost-leveraging back into the position on a pullback.

Just remember the usual disclaimer: Don’t base any of your investment decisions on anything you read here — do your own due diligence — or at least enough research to pick the right professional to do it for you.

Who will win the DOD awards?

June 29, 2009 - Leave a Response
While much of the mainstream news will likely be focused again on Michael Jackson and the business news focusing on Madoff’s sentencing — keep your eye on your own pocketbook.
 
I’m doing some DD on companies who are likely contenders to be awarded lucrative contracts from the Department of Defense.
 
The usual disclaimer: Don’t base any of your research on anything you read here. Do your own due diligence, or at least enough research to pick the right professional to do it for you.

You’ve GOT to read this!

June 25, 2009 - Leave a Response

Who’s on your DD list today?

June 24, 2009 - Leave a Response

With the WS Journal reporting that a sales slowdown has trimmed Oracle’s profit and the company is reporting fiscal fourth-quarter earning of $1.89 billion, which is down from $2.04 billion a year earlier — I have placed it on my due diligence list.

One tip to others also considering doing due diligence on this company — watch the volatility on it, and pay attention to all the options trading in this.

The WSJ is also reporting Republic has reached a deal to buy Midwest. It’s worth my time to do some DD on them, as well.

Just remember the usual disclaimer: Don’t base any of your investment decisions on anything you read here. Do your own due diligences, or at least enough research to pick the right professional to do it for you.

Is PCS on your due diligence list?

June 23, 2009 - Leave a Response

With news on Monday that MetroPCS will be entering the S&P — have you done your due diligence on it?

I have….

Nice pop today.

But newbies beware — options traders are all over this baby.

Just remember the usual disclaimer: Don’t base any of your investment decisions on anything you read here. Do your own due diligence, or at least enough research to pick the right professional to do it for you.

Be honest with your investment ability

June 21, 2009 - Leave a Response

So how are you guys doing in the midst of our 30-day “play the market with Monopoly money” experiment?

I actually know the answer to that question based upon the feedback I’ve received.

Let me address some of your concerns.

I’m beginning to feel a bit like a broken record on one particular matter — and based on the frequency of this question, it’s very clear to me that there’s a segment of readers here who don’t read beyond one or two columns.

I call these my “one shot wonders,” whom I can only assume find a link to this site from another site or Google, read one column, and then send me a message asking me to explain the entire market to them in 20 words or less — or better yet –if I could just give them one stock name that’s going to soar — that’s all they need.

And then they usually try to post the message a second time, followed by a third post asking why their first two posts aren’t showing up.

The reason is because this is a site about the stock market and investments that is geared toward the newbie investor. While many similar sites let anyone post who wishes to, and fly by the “every man for himself” and “buyer beware” motto — I refuse to let this site be infiltrated by those who wish to drive a stock price higher or lower by spinning the information about a stock, in the hopes of artificially driving the stock into a price that is personally beneficial to the spinmeister.

It simply ain’t gonna happen here on my watch.

On the other hand, on my business blog for members-only of EnterActive Media, it is every man and woman for themselves — but that’s a site aimed at the more seasoned investors, who don’t fall for the bull. They laugh off any nonsense.

You will occasionally find a few members from my EAM site wander over here to post a message, and they are allowed to do so with access I’ve granted them.

If they ever violate the trust I’ve given them and they start dropping stock names and trying to put some spin on them — even if they have the best of intentions — they know they’ll quickly be banned from both this site and my EAM site. Since there has long been a waiting list to join that forum — I think I can trust them.

Now that I’ve repeated that info — let’$ talk money!

I feel like a proud mom to so many of you who are really getting the hang of the way to trade the current market — and have shared with me what positions you took on each day during our play-money game — and I know you’re starting to feel that itch to start trading some real money.

Good for you — but be careful.

The market is volatile, it not only can shift from day-to-day, but often from minute-to-minute.

Before planking down a cent of your hard-earned money, double-up your due diligence to make damn sure you know what you’re buying — and why you’re buying it — and then monitor that stock like it’s an infant on life support.

The fact is when you do your due diligence, and you find a company that makes a good product that there’s a demand for, no matter what’s going on in the world, and the P/E ratio is great, and their balance sheet is outstanding, and they don’t have a heavy debt load, and the analysts aren’t waving any red flags, and you truly understand what the company does — terrific — you’ve just begun your homework.

But you’re still not ready to buy a single share.

You darn well keep those sleeves rolled-up and find out who owns it. Which large funds hold a large stake in the company, and check to see how long those funds have held it, and what the likelihood is they will continue to hold it.

Then find out what the option traders are doing with the stock. What are the puts and call spreads. It’s okay, even though you’re not ready to start trading options, you should at least have a fundamental understanding of how the options spread on a stock can affect it,

Also, is there about to be a big announcement from the company, either about a new product you’ve read about in their analyst reports that they’ll soon be rolling out, or they’re due to file their quarterly report, or something else about to happen — and decide if you should be ahead or behind that announcement.

How about their competitors? Are they about to make a major announcement or roll-out a new product, or file their quarterly report? If so, how is that going to impact your stock?

I don’t say all this to try to douse your spirits — just to point out that learning how to actually buy low and sell high is something a first grader could do. In fact, I often believe a first grader would be better at it, as they wouldn’t be so emotionally invested in it, and would just make the trades automatically.

But as an adult, you should know, and be prepared to do, all the research that goes along with it.

Which brings me to the other side of the coin — those of you who are aggravated.

You find it all too much.

You’re still thinking there’s just got to be a shortcut way to do your own investing.

There isn’t.

There are three choices for those who wish to invest:

1. You can be a complete moron, skip the due diligence, buy a stock in a company you don’t know much about, and hope you get lucky — that’s not my style.

2. You can make a commitment that you’re not going to look for any “hot tips.” You’re not going to fall for anyone on the Internet hyping or dissing a stock. And you are going to spend many-many hours researching a company, its competitors and its entire sector before you invest a penny.

Here’s one “tip” you can use: If every time you complete your due diligence you think you’ve picked a winner — you’re probably fooling yourself. My ratio is more about 20 to 1. For every 20 companies I think are great — I find only one that’s really worth investing in.

But don’t think of it as wasted time. The next time you consider buying either that same company or its sector, you already have a base in place form earlier research that will make your new due diligence much smoother, and you can compare what you knew about the company previously to what it is currently doing today.

3. You’re other option is to be honest with yourself and admit that even if you spent a good 20 hours researching a company and bought some shares for a good price — you know you don’t have the stamina or fortitude to continue the due diligence while you’re invested in it, and you’re planning to just close your eyes and hope a year from now that you made a wise decision.

I’ve never been a fan of Russian Roulette.

Don’t do it.

Instead, invest that time in researching funds and fund managers to take your money and invest it for you.

Personally, whenever possible I steer clear of mutual funds, as I enjoy doing my own research, refuse to pay the management fees — especially the back-loads, and there’s usually a dud or two in the fund’s portfolio that I’d rather not own.

But if I wasn’t planning to do my own research, or felt I’d lose interest once I owned a position, then I’d likely find a fund manager I trusted and whose largest positions were in investments I agreed with.

There’s no shame in admitting investing on your own is not for you — there really isn’t.

I just came in from an exhilarating afternoon of kite-boarding on the ocean — but I’m smart enough to realize that I’m unable to ski on snow, so I don’t go up the slopes, unless I plan on sliding down on my rear end.

Be honest with what your capability and commitment level is to investing — and you’ll be much better off.

And just to show there are no hard feelings for those of you who realize that trying to eventually keep up with the big guys over on my EAM site just isn’t the right move for you, I’d like to give a free plug for you to begin learning about mutual funds on Morningstar.

For all the rest who are committed to investing on their own — let’s see how you can do when I don’t spoon-feed you some names to do due diligence on.

Yes, guys, you may have had some nice pops in Hershey and other names I’ve given you over the last two weeks, but would you have honestly been playing those names if I didn’t mention them?

You don’t have to answer to me — just be honest with yourselves.

Just remember the usual disclaimer: Don’t base any of your investment decisions on anything you read here. Do your own due diligence, or at least enough research to pick the right professional to do it for you.

Futures are up pre-opening bell & options expiring

June 19, 2009 - Leave a Response

Okay, traders, be on your toes today!

With many options set to expire today and the market trading about 30 points above fair value before the opening bell — this is going to be a very interesting day on the street.

Let all the business news concentrate on Allen Stanford being indicted — just keep your own eye on your own money.

The usual names are on my “play list,” including the recently added AMGN. Brand new to the due diligence list today is Hershey and Microsoft.

Just remember the usual disclaimer: Don’t base any of your investment decisions on anything you read here — do your own due diligence — or at least enough research to pick the right professional to do it for you.

Obama’s new plan for the markets — just what we don’t need

June 17, 2009 - Leave a Response

As an always above board play-by-the-rules investor — I loathe this new regulatory reform plan by the Obama administration to supposedly bring more transparency to the market.

It’s just what we don’t need — more bureaucracy — more regulation — more people with political leanings controlling the market.

I’m not happy that the people who are going to be in charge of Wall Street will be the same ones who have brought us bailout after bailout — not one of which did I support.

I believe in the free market system.

If your company fails — big or small — let it fail — or at least go through the bankruptcy process.

I don’t believe in the nonsense that any company is “too big to fail.”

Now we can look forward to new agencies and councils, a national bank supervisor, new rules for securitization, the fed becoming the system’s risk regulator… and it goes on and on.

Perfect.

Just what the market doesn’t need.

Of course the market needs to be watched and regulated — but the president needs to deal with the problem that caused this recent meltdown head-on — not cover it up by using nice-sounding catch-phrases like “transparency” — when he’s doing the complete opposite and adding layers of bureaucracy.

For instance, I still want to know why the SEC never figured out what Madoff was up to?

How in the world did this fly by their radar screen?

Address that question, before telling me you’re going to add even more layers of government,where everyone gets to point at the other when the shit hits the fan.

Transparency?

Nice word — if only the plan fit the tagline.